Read Macbeth by William Shakespeare Online


Krijgsheer Macbeth is een trouwe vazal van de Schotse koning. Op een dag voorspellen drie heksen hem dat hij ooit koning van Schotland zal worden. Ambitieus als hij is en aangemoedigd door zijn vrouw besluit hij het lot een handje te helpen en doodt hij koning Duncan. Eenmaal op de troon ontwikkelt hij zich tot een wrede tiran, die steeds meer moorden nodig heeft om zich tKrijgsheer Macbeth is een trouwe vazal van de Schotse koning. Op een dag voorspellen drie heksen hem dat hij ooit koning van Schotland zal worden. Ambitieus als hij is en aangemoedigd door zijn vrouw besluit hij het lot een handje te helpen en doodt hij koning Duncan. Eenmaal op de troon ontwikkelt hij zich tot een wrede tiran, die steeds meer moorden nodig heeft om zich te kunnen handhaven. De prijs die hij en zijn vrouw voor hun koninklijke status moeten betalen blijkt uiteindelijk erg hoog......

Title : Macbeth
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 9789001811389
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 195 Pages
Status : Available For Download
Last checked : 21 Minutes ago!

Macbeth Reviews

  • Madeline
    2019-03-31 21:43

    Years after first adding this to my "Shakespeare" shelf, I finally sat down and did it. So here, long overdue, isThe Scottish Play, abridged:WITCHES: Bibbity bobbity boo! Time to fuck with the mortals!DUNCAN: Isn’t Macbeth great? Now there’s a guy I can always trust to have my back. I should promote him.MACBETH AND DUNCAN: WEEEEE ARE THE CHAMPIONS, MY FRIEEEENDS. YES WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS, WEEEE ARE THE CHAMPIONS, NO TIME FOR -WITCHES: ThaneofGlamisandCawdorandFutureKingsayswhat?MACBETH: What?WITCHES: Oh, and Banquo, your kids are going to be kings someday. Good luck working that one out! *POOFvanish*BANQUO: ...Dude.MACBETH: Great news, honey! I meet these witches and they told me I was gonna be the thane of Cawdor and then BAM the king promoted me, and they also said I was gonna be king someday, so I guess Duncan’s going to make me his heir or something.LADY MACBETH: Cool. I’ll invite him over and then you can kill him.MACBETH: I…wait, what?LADY MACBETH: KILL THE KING, YOU PUSSY!DUNCAN: Hey, Macbeth, how’s my favorite - MACBETH: I KEEL YOU!DUNCAN’S SONS: *GTFO*BANQUO: So anyway, son, apparently you’re going to be king someday, but I don’t really see how since now Macbeth’s the king, but anyway...ASSASSIN: I KEEL YOU!BANQUO’S SON: *GTFO*MACBETH: Hey there, nice witches, I need some help. I just saw Duncan's ghost and I’ve been killing a lot of people and my wife’s losing what few marbles she had to begin with –LADY MACBETH: THE BLOOD IS THE LIFE! THE BLOOD IS THE LIFE! I KEEL MYSELF (offstage)!MACBETH: - and I’m not so sure about this whole prophecy thing anymore.WITCHES: Don’t sweat it, you can’t be killed by any man born of woman, and you won’t really be in trouble until the forest starts moving.MACBETH: Wait, didn’t something kind of like that happen in The Lord of the Rings? WITCHES: NO. Also, watch out for Macduff.MACBETH: Cool, I’ll go kill his whole family now.WITCHES: This is just too much fun. We should have thought of this years ago.MACDUFF: Macbeth, you are SO going down. MACBETH: Joke’s on you, sucker! I can’t be killed by anyone born of woman, and since Caesarians haven’t been invented you…oh shit. MACDUFF: I KEEL YOU!WITCHES: More popcorn, Hecate? THE END.

  • David
    2019-04-22 00:45

    Don't you kind of hate how we've entered the decadent phase of Goodreads wherein perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed in their variously effective attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the good ol' days of Goodreads (known then as when all reviews were uniformly plainspoken, merely utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- dull, dull, dull? Don't you kind of hate when people say 'don't you think this way or feel that way' in an effort to goad you both psychologically and grammatically into agreeing with them?In the words of ABBA: I do, I do, I do(, I do, I do).Well, because the interwebs is a world in which the past stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we can revisit the past in its inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least until this website finally tanks.Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in its entirety. I have bound it with a heavy rope and dragged it here for your perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are implied in the following reviews.)its really complicated and stupid!why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?!at least that book is good!There you have it. Refreshingly, not a review written in one of the witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal yell unleashed into the dark wilderness of the cosmos. Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the same play. You may 'know' MICHAEL; he is the 'Problems Architect' here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for all I know.)This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you don't want to read is awful.Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it was meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not a play. On top of that the teach had us students read the play aloud (on person for each character for a couple pages). None of us had read the play before. None of us wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the 'easy' english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem).I also hate iambic pentameter.Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to read a play then you have sinned and are going to hell, if you believe in hell. If not, you're going to the DMV.I am also tired of all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others to kowtow to your petty linguistic rules. Artistic expression will free itself no matter how you try to shackle it.That's your cue, Aubrey.In my personal opinion, the play Macbeth was the worste peice ever written by Shakespeare, and this is saying quite a bit considering i also read his Romeo and Juliet. Ontop of it's already unbelievable plot, unrealistic characters and absolutly discusting set of morals, Shakespeare openly portrays Lady Macbeth as the true vilian in the play. Considering she is mearly the voice in the back round and Macbeth himself is truely committing the hideous crimes, including murder and fraud, I do not see why it is so easy to assume that Macbeth would be willing to do good instead of evil if only his wife were more possitive. I believe that this play is uterally unrealistic.But the following is by far the ne plus ultra of classic book reviewing. While succinct and without any distracting inclination to coyness or cuteness, Jo's review alludes to a bitterness so profound that it is inexpressible. One imagines a few Signet Classic Editions hacked to bits with pruning shears in Jo's vicinity.I hate this play. So much so that I can't even give you any analogies or similes as to how much I despise it. An incrementally snarkier type might have said something like... 'I hate this play like a simile I can't come up with.' Not Jo. She speaks a raw, undecorated truth unfit for figurative language. And there's certainly nothing wrong with that. Once in a great while, when you get neck-deep in dandified pomo hijinks, it's a nice wallow in the hog pen you're itchin' for. Thank you, Jo. I love you and your futile grasping at similes that can't approach the bilious hatred in your heart. You are mine, and I am yours. Figuratively speaking, of course. And now here's my review:Macbeth by William Shakespeare is the greatest literary work in the English language, and anyone who disagrees is an asshole and a dumbhead.

  • Annie
    2019-04-22 21:51

    Ladies and gentlemen, may I present A Thing You Probably Didn't Want But Are Going To Get Anyway:Macbeth, in GIFs:Witches: King Duncan to Macbeth: Macbeth to King (secretly): Lady Macbeth: Macbeth: Lady Macbeth to Macbeth: Macbeth to Duncan: Everyone: Malcom and Donalbain: Macbeth: Macbeth to Banquo: Macbeth: Fleance: Malcolm to Macduff: Macduff and Malcom: Macbeth: Lady Macbeth: Lady Macbeth: Macbeth: Army: Macbeth: Macbeth: Witches: Everyone:

  • BillKerwin
    2019-04-20 23:50

    Macbeth is Shakespeare's darkest play not only because of the restricted palette of its images--shades of black varied with bright red blood--but also because, in the play's world of warfare and witchcraft, its hero is half-damned from the start. Inured to violence, prone to superstition, Macbeth struggles with the hags' predictions in the depth of his soul. But his wife, fiercely ambitious, never struggles. When he is haunted by his imagination, she is steadfast: preparing everything, looking after the details, urging him on. It is only afterward, when he is thoroughly damned, coldly vicious, that she finds she cannot wash Duncan's blood off from her hands.Among other things, this play is the portrait of a good marriage. If, that is, a good marriage can be made in hell.

  • Brina
    2019-04-24 00:25

    Over the past year, I have branched out in my reading, attempting authors and genres that I had not discovered before. Recently, I read Serena by Ron Rash in which the title character is compared to Lady Macbeth. While Serena may be ruthless, I had never read the play so I could not contrast the two heroines. Another of my reading goals this year is increasing my reading of classics. Up until now, I had predominantly read modern classics, and found a worthy reason to read an older masterpiece. So it is without further adieu that I present my take on the Bard's Macbeth. Shakespeare penned Macbeth around the year 1606 when he was already established as a reputed playwright. For this play, he chose a contemporary Scottish soldier and references the Scottish crown within the text. Yet, as in most of Shakespeare's works, the Bard was not as much concerned with the history surrounding the play, as he was with the characters themselves, their desires and motivations. Thus, Macbeth is regarded as Shakespeare's darkest tragedy. The tale begins when Macbeth visits three witches, later of "double, double, toil, trouble" fame. They prophesy that he will become the Thane of Crowder, Thane of Glowdis, and King of Scotland. Yet, the men who hold these titles are all currently alive. Lady Macbeth plots and decides to murder all the key players who stand in the way of her husband becoming king, framing other upstanding individuals for her actions. She even goes as far as killing those who relayed news to her that King Duncan had been killed, even though she herself committed the crime. As the tale continues, the Lady now Queen continues to plot and has servants and soldiers at her disposal to do her bidding. Meanwhile, Macbeth also grows weary of rivals to the crown and plots to eliminate anyone who goes against him. While Lady Macbeth is at ease being an evil mastermind, Macbeth reaches the point where he can not live with himself for murdering Duncan. He returns to the witches in an attempt to change the prophesy, but it is not to be. At this point, Lady Macbeth grows emotionally unstable, while Macbeth himself is no longer afraid to die in battle as penance for previous crimes committed. It is clear that Shakespeare intended for the Lady to be the more hungry individual in this drama. As in all Shakespearean works, the text is not long but a little tedious if one is unused to old English. Because I had just read Serena, I read along quickly looking for comparisons to the two women, allowing me to be more engrossed in the prose than I might have been otherwise. Shakespeare's words remain timeless over 400 years later, deeming Macbeth, as well as his other works, worthy reads. This play was fun because the characters were so dark, encouraging me to read more Shakespearean tales in the future.

  • Huda Yahya
    2019-03-27 23:24

    Told by an idiot, full of sound and furySignifying nothingهذا في رأيي هو أفضل سطر كتب عن العدمية في التاريخوهو السطر الذي استمد منه فولكنز عنوان روايته الشهيرة -الصخب والعنفهذا هو كتابي المفضل رقم (1)‏وسيظل كذلك ما حييتنبوغ شكسبير لا يحتاج أحدا ليدلل عليهفأكيف بالله عليكم أحلل أو أناقش عملا لهلا أملك الجرأة بعدوإن أتتني الجرأة فهل تسعفني الكلمات؟قصتي مع ماكبث تتلخص في هيام تام بكل حرف كُتبوبكل مشهد صورسطور ماكبث تطاردني في كل مكانتحلق أمامي أبدية الخلودتؤكد لي يوما بعد يوم أنها ستظل محفورة بداخلياستطعتُ بعد عناء فصل قراءاتي عن هذا الهوس بماكبثوتوقفت عن مقارنة كتاب مهما كانت عظمته بتلك السطور الشعرية المدهشةوعلمت نفسي ان اتوقف عن التصرف بطفولية قائلة في سذاجةبس ماكبث أحلىبس ماكبث أعمقبس ماكبث أهم‏هذا كان من زمن بعيد يقترب من العشر سنواتوفيه كان الانبهار يسيطر على كيانيويعميني عن جماليات الأدب في كل مجالولكن يبقى هذا الامتنان العميق للكونلأنه استطاع أن يقدم لذائقتي ولروحي ولكياني كله هذا العمل الذي ليس كمثله شيءحاولت كثيرا أن أكتب عن ماكبث تحليلا يليق بهاولكنني عجزت وعجز قلمي عن مجرد الخربشة عنهاربما أفعل يوماولكن حتى الآن لا يبقى لي سوى هذا العشق الجارف لأعظم عمل أدبي على مر العصور::وسأظل أقشعر عند قراءة هذه السطورTo-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow‏,‏Creeps in this petty pace from day to day‎‏,‏To the last syllable of recorded time‏;‏And all our yesterdays have lighted foolsThe way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle‏!‏Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player‏,‏That struts and frets his hour upon the stage‏,‏And then is heard no more. It is a taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury‏,‏Signifying nothing‏...

  • Jason
    2019-04-23 00:30

    There are two reasons to love this play.The first reason is Lady Macbeth. Man, that girl has got it goin’ on. Have you ever found yourself in the running for, say, a new position that’s opened up at your company, a position for which you—along with one of your equally worthy colleagues, perhaps—might qualify? You may not have given much thought to your professional advancement before, but now that this promotion has been dangled before you, it has ignited a spark of ambitious desire. Imagine the possibilities! And it is just within your grasp...if only there were a way to edge out the competition. Maybe you could sabotage a project he’s working on. Or you could discredit him by rumoring of his incompetence. Better yet, you could off him in the parking garage. But each of these strategies requires a certain level of gumption to execute, a level not everyone possesses. This is where it pays to be married to Lady Macbeth. All she would need is a mere mention of this potential uptick in your career path and she’s off and running, drafting the schematics, telling you where to stand (just outside the stairwell, across from his car, within easy reach of the tire iron lying in the corner that can be used while he’s distractedly sifting through his keys). Why doesn’t she do it herself, you ask? Well, why should she? It’s not her job. Her job is to support you, to boost your confidence, to supply that additional gumption. You’re the one who has to do the dirty work.Lady Macbeth is an amazing character. I’ve seen reviews on here that criticize her for being the morally reprehensible of the two protagonists, planting ideas in her husband’s head that he would not have otherwise formed, encouraging him toward evil deeds that he would not have otherwise committed. I disagree. She may have made a mistake helping to plan Duncan’s murder, but if anything Lady Macbeth is the one with her moral faculties still intact—she exhibits a profound sense of remorse at the end of the play that Macbeth recognizes as nothing short of an ailment for which to seek a cure. While Macbeth is off slaughtering anyone who might threaten his regal standing, his wife is at home rubbing the fuck out of her hands until the blisters explode and she suffocates in a pool of her own pus.The second reason to love this play is the eloquence of the language. There are passages in this play that describe human emotion so briefly yet so profoundly it triggers goosebumps. These are some of my favorites:On expressing one’s grief:What, man! ne’er pull your hat upon your brows;Give sorrow words: the grief that does not speakWhispers the o’er-fraught heart and bids it break.On not having enough gumption:Yet do I fear thy nature;It is too full o’ the milk of human kindnessTo catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great;Art not without ambition, but withoutThe illness should attend it.On contemplating ambition’s worth:Nought’s had, all’s spent,Where our desire is got without content:’Tis safer to be that which we destroyThan by destruction dwell in doubtful joy.On being past the point of no return:All causes shall give way: I am in bloodStepp’d in so far that, should I wade no more,Returning were as tedious as go o’er.On the futility of life:Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor playerThat struts and frets his hour upon the stageAnd then is heard no more: it is a taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury,Signifying nothing.On the finality of death:There’s nothing serious in mortality:All is but toys: renown and grace is dead;The wine of life is drawn, and the mere leesIs left this vault to brag of.I said in the comments section of my Hamlet review that I was preferring Hamlet to Macbeth. While I think I prefer the character of Hamlet to that of Macbeth, I no longer stand by that statement in terms of the play itself. Macbeth really is a masterpiece.

  • Mohammed Arabey
    2019-04-12 21:30

    هي قصة جنرال جيش، يكافئه الملك بحكم مدينةلكنه ينقلب عليه ويقتله، لطموحٍ ونبوءة خبيثةليصبح ملكا بالانقلاب، ويده ستخضب بدماء عديدةانها لعبة العروش...تلك اللعبة المقيتةمن اقترف في سبيلها جريمة..ستجر عليه خطيئة تلو الخطيئةاه يا جورج آر آر مارتين..لقد ظلمناك ظلما مبينالقد فاقك شكسبير دموية...وقتل الضيف ولم يراع حقوق المُضيفةهو انا عشان قريت مسرحيتين، لن اكتب مراجعات سوي بتلك الطريقة؟عذرا مرة اخري عزيزي القارئ..إن العادات لا تموت إلا ميتة بطيئة"ملحوظة : المراجعة من وحي الخيال..واي تشابه بينها وبين الواقع فهو من محض الصدفة والخيال"واتمني ان يقرأها كل الحكام...ولا يكتفوا بمجرد القراءة حتي الفصل الثانيساكتفي في الريفيو علي سبع ملاحظات علي مكابث لاحظتها واعجبتنيفلا اعتقد اني اصلح للكتابة بشكل متعمق عن هذا الرجل العبقري الذي مازال اعماله بعد 400 عاما خالدة وعجيبةأولا : النبوءة والسحر--------بصراحة ... بسبب وجود بها الساحرات بدات بتلك المسرحية بعد "حلم ليلة منتصف صيف" و "دقة بدقة" ، حيث ان الاولي كانت عن قصص الجنيات الخيالية والتي اعترف انها تروق لي مثل هذه الغرائبيات والفانتازي الخفيفهذه الرواية بها ساحرات...و بها نبوءة...بل ان مشهدها الأول يبدأ بالساحرات والحوار اخذ اكثر من وقته عن التنبؤات والسحرولاحظ أن النبوءة ليست أمرا حسنا بل هو من الشيطان..من ثلاث ساحرات شمطاوات وارواح شريرةملاحظتي بالنسبة للامر هو أن تنبؤات الساحرات لم تثبت صحتها ، بل كل ما فعله كلام الساحرات بأول الحكاية هو شيئا حدث بالفعل وقد قرره الملك ولكن قبل ان يسمعه ماكبثربما بالسحر الاسود او حتي بمجرد علم النفس فعلا يمكنك أن تعرف مايدور بنوايا من امامكولكن علم الغيب عند ربي ومحاولات خرق الغيب بطريقة شيطانية لن تجر سوي المصائبفباقي النبوءة كانت كلام غيبي لم يؤدي سوي لشرود ذهن ماكبث وتلاعب طموحه...وطموح زوجته بعقلهمما أدي لدمار حيوات كثيرة..مما ادي لتحوله 180 درجة من رجل اخلاقي لغير اخلاقيفلا انكر انني استبشرت خيرا -خاصا اني لا اعرف احداث المسرحية علي الاطلاق- عندما قرأت اول مشهد لماكبث حتي قبل النبوءة مباشراكما قالت جي كي رولينج في هاري بوتر بعدها باعوام كثيرةان الانسان هو من يحقق النبوءة بأفعالهوكما قالت مسرحية "الي الغابة" التي قرأتها مؤخرا"احذر الطريق الذي تسلكه الأمنيات..فالأمنيات تتحقق..ولها ثمن"لقد تنبأت الساحرات لماكبث المُلك..فصار ملكا بالأنقلاب...بالخطيئة والدماءتنبأت الا يهزمه أحد وضعته أمرأه...فزاد طغيانه وتكبره وعدوانه(view spoiler)[ولكن لاحظ أن هناكTwistرائع في نهاية الأحداث ان من قتله كان فعلا لم تضعه امرأة وانما شقت بطن امهيبدو ان الكلاسيكيات التي عفا عليها 400 عاما مازالت قادرة علي الأبهار (hide spoiler)]ولكن...لاحظ وصف شكل الروح الأخيرة التي حضرت وتنبأت بأمر الغابة التي ستتقدم للأمام, وهي النبوءة الأخيرة..ستلاحظ كم كان دقيقا شكسبير في وصف السحر..وأنه قد يكون صحيحاولكنه ايضا له ثمن** ملاحظة جانبية **لعنة ماكبثهل تعلم ان تلك المسرحية يصاحبها لعنة فلا احد ينطق لفظ ماكبث علي خشبة المسرح اثناء الاعدادات لها لأنه يجلب سوء الحظ بناء علي حوادث مؤسفة حقيقية؟لا يوجد تأكيد عن حالات قتل بالطبع..ولكن هناك شائعة شهيرة أن ابراهام لينكلون كان يقرأ مسرحيته المفضلة "ماكبث" ليلة ذهابه للمسرحية التي تم اغتياله فيهالذا يطلقوا عليها "المسرحية الاسكتلندية" أو مسرحية الشاعرThe Scottish Play يمكنك البحث عن المزيد عنها في ويكابيديا تحت اسممن تلك الأسباب العجيبة ان البعض يقول أن شكسبير استلهم بعض كلمات الساحرات الثلاثة من وكر لساحرات حقيقيات مما جعل المسرحية ملعونة-------------------------ثانياحواءوأغواء المرأة------حسنا , عئرا سيداتي أنساتي وسادتيفي اول ريفيو "إلي داخل الغابة" كتبت خطئا مايلي"وحتي خطيئة أدم الأولي..أطاع حواء وأكلا من تفاحة الشجرة الوحيدة المحرمة عليهما في الجنة"وتلقيت لفت انتباه من اثنان من زملائنا بالجودريدز المحترمات باستياء من "أطاع حواء" وخاصا ان ليس هناك سند لأن حواء هي من ألحت علي أدم في القرأنوبمراجعة سريعةوجدت أنهما يقولان الحقيقة-اهدي شوية بقي في السجع ده خنقتنا-ولكن دعونا نتفق ان بعض الكتب الدينية المغلوطة وحتي الاسرائيليات تعج بصورة سيئة لحواء وانها هي اصل الشر وانها من اغوي ادم للخطيئة الأولي بما لم يأتي في الكتب السماوية من ذلك بسلطانودعونا لا ننس ان القرن السادس عشر كان من تلك القرون التي لا يتم فيها الاهتمام بالمرأة بشكل كبير وبها اضطهاد وحتي حرق الساحراتلقد جعلها شكسبير هنا هي الحية التي اغوت ماكبث علي ان يقتل الملك ويصير هو ملك البلاد في حوار نفسي طويل بينها وبين نفسها منذ ان علمت من رسالة منه بنبوءة الساحرات الخبيثةقدم شكسبير صورة قوية جدا للمرأة هنا..ولكنها ماكرة وخبيثة وصلبة بحق..طامعة ولها القدرة علي التلاعب بعقول الرجالقد تكون نموذج فعلا سواء في الحقيقة والتاريخ او الادب...قد يراها البعض نموذج سئ وللحق يقال ليس بالرواية نموذج مقابل لهاولكنها نموذج حقيقي وموجودقد لا تكون حواء هي فعلا من اقنع ادم ان يأكلا من التفاحةولكن هيلين طروادة والملكة ماري وغيرها الكثير كانوا علامات قوية في التاريخ وادوا لنقاط فاصله بهولكن شكسبير في الفصل الاخير من تلك المسرحية يقدم لنا نهاية بعدالة شعرية لها..لا انكر انني تعاطفت معها بالنهاية وحزنت لما ألت عليهلدي ضعف ما تجاه مثل تلك الشخصيات عندما تضعف..هل قلت لك من قبل ان "سيرسي" هي شخصيتي المفضلة في جيم اوف ثرونز التي لم تمت بعد؟-واخاف قراءة الكتاب الخامس لاعرف ماذا سيحدث في محاكمتها----------------------------ثالثاالطموح..والميكيافيللية--------الصراع النفسي بين ماكبث وزوجته لا شئ بجوار الصراع بداخله قبل أن يقتل الملكسطور عديدة بين ماكبث ونفسه حول الجبن والضعف والحكم والطموحومبادئ ميكيافيللي التي يتأثر بها ماكبث -ويذكرها- صراحة بالأحداث كي يصل لغايتهلم أتخيل ان اقرأ بمسرحية كل هذه السطور التي تتغلغل في النفسية بهذا الشكلالطموح الرجولي بالمُلك متأثرا بنبوءة شيطانية واطماع نسائية مكتوب بشكل أقوي من خبراء علوم النفسيةلا أعتقد أن ماكبث كما قالت دعاية الرواية رجل غير اخلاقي...بالعكس هو رجل اخلاقي ولكن بسبب الساحرات واغواء الطموح المرتفع المغالي فيه...ودفعه بزيادة باطماع زوجته تحول الي ما تحول اليهويظهر لك شكسبير هئا التحول خطوة بخطوةالسطور كثيرة التي تصلح للاقتباسات هنا احترت ما يمكن الأختيار منها ولكن بحق اقرأوا المسرحية , أعتقد انها من مسرحياته التي تستحق--------------------رابعاالغدر"قانون الضيافة"-------هنا شعرت ان فعلا جورج آر آر مارتين ودموية حفل الزواج الأحمر الذي كتبه في سلسلته لم يأتي من فراغ..بل له اصول في الأدبلقد قرأت مؤخرا -قبل ان افكر بجدية القراءة لشكسبير علي الاطلاق- أن مارتين ينتقد منتقديه عن كثرة القتل باحداث سلسلته الأشهر "أغنية الجليد والنار" /لعبة العروش وقال ألم تقرأوا شكسبير يوما؟اتذكر انه استشهد بهاملت وقتها التي تم قتل فيها اغلب الأبطال..بل واتذكر حلقة سيمبسون التي كان بها بارودي "محاكاة ساخرة" لقصص شكسبير وان الابطال يموتون بها دائماأعتقد أن مشهد قتل الملك بتلك المسرحية كان من ابشع المشاهد الدموية التي قرأتها في حياتي..لم يكتفي بخرق قانون الضيافة بل وفعل ما هو أسوأالمشهد والاسلوب وكيف يعمي الانسان من اجل طموحه كان بشعا بحقالدماء التي لن يمحيها المياه , مع ما حدث للملكة بالنهاية كتبها شكسبير بطريقة فعلا يحق لها أن تخلد في التاريخ-----------------خامسالعبة العروش------في سبيل الكرسي قد نرتكب بعض الخطايا الصعيرة..كذبة ما..وشاية..نفاق..ولكنالخطيئة تجر خطيئة تجر خطيئةطالما لم تعترف وتتوب من الخطيئة الأولي وقمت بتبريرها..أو حتي ألقاء لومها علي غيركفستظل فيها..وستضاعفها ايضامابالك ان كانت الخطيئة سبب كونك ملكا للبلاد؟مابالك لو كانت هذه الخطيئة دماء؟جاء ماكبث ملكا للبلاد بانقلابوليحافظ علي هذا الملك الوهن تحول لديكتاتورولأن يديه ملوثتان بدماءلن يذهبهما بعض الماءكما قالت زوجته بعد فعلتهما الشنعاءفي المسرحية شكل تشاؤمي للغاية عن استحالة وجود ملك عادل يديه غير مخضبتان بالدماء طوال سير الحياةوكيف ان الحاكم الديكتاتوري سيخرج عليه ثورات لأنه سيهمل في البلاد, فلا وقت لديه سوي البحث عن اعداءه وقتلهم وتصفيتهم والتمسك بالكرسي والحكم والسلطة فحسبملاحظة مهمة أكررها : أحداث المراجعة لا علاقة لها بالواقع , وأي تشابه هو من قبيل الصدفة او محض خيال ليس اكثرمش ناقصين لعنة ماكبث انزل يابني بالنقطة السادسة-------------------------سادساالعدالة الشعرية--------تئنيب ضمير ومتاعب حقيقية نفسيةانها نتيجة حتميةتقريبا في كل الملاحم الشكسبيريةولكني جديد العهد به..والفضل يرجع لحلم ليلة منتصف صيفية-لقد صرت سخيفا بحق, أعلم ذلك-يجب ان اعترف ان هذا الشئ هو مايرفع تقييمي لاعمال شكسبير ببراعة..فبعد كل الصراعات التي تحدث تجد رسالة وهدف نبيل للغايةربما اذا ما كان قد قرأها بعض الحكام لأتعظوا..ولكن يبدو أنهم يتوقفون عن القراءة بعد الفصل الثانيأما عن زوجة ماكبث(view spoiler)[ولكن صعبت عليا كثيرا جدا زوجة ماكبيث وكيف لم يلق لها بالا وتعامل مع موتها بكل برودوايضا مشهد الغابة كان ممتازا..والرجل الذي لم تضعه امرأة كما قلت قبلا (hide spoiler)]-------------سابعا واخيراالدقة التاريخية------علي فكرة ماكبث ملك حقيقي لاسكتلندا وخلف الملك دنكان بعد ان قتله في معركة حربية في 1040...تزوج من بعدها من حفيدة الملك كينيث الثالث ليعزز منصبه علي العرشوحكم لمدة 14 عاما كانت فترة حكمه تتسم بالهدوء والعدل بل وقد سافر الي روما 1050 في "يوبيل" للعفو والغفرانوبالفعل بسبب ان سيوارد اراد ان يعيد أبن دنكان "مالكوم" في 1054 لعرش ملك اسكتلدنا قام بشن حرب علي ماكبث والذي تم قتله علي يد مالكوم في 1057لقد قام شكسبير بتغيير التاريخولكن في سبيل عظة عن لعبة العروش والطموح وخطيئة القتل والديكتاتورية في اطار روائي, عذرا مسرحية تراجيديانعم حاول وضع نبوءة في صالح ملك أسكتلندا وانجلترا وقتها لرابطة صداقة بينهما "حيث أن الملك جيمس فعلا من احفاد بانكو كما تنبأت السحرة" ولكن لاحظ أن التغييرات لم تكن كارثية كما فعلت بعض الروايات الحديثة في التاريخ الموثق في الكتب السماوية بحجة المعالجة الروائيةفلم يظهر ماكبث مسلما مثلا أو كان يسعي لحكم أيطاليالذلك جائت تلك التراجيديا بهذه القوة وخلدها التاريخفهي عن النفس البشرية..عن لعبة العروش والديكتاتوريةعن النبوءات والاطماع والعدالة الشعريةأطلت الريفيو ولكن لم اقل كل ماكنت اود ان اقولمحمد العربيفي 23 ابريل 2016["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>

  • Lyn
    2019-03-31 19:46

    “By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes.”Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy is also one of his most powerful. Macbeth’s lust for power is compulsory, when confronted with the witches’ prophesy he is drawn into the tragedy as if he were a runaway train on tracks. He must fulfill his ambition.“To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,To the last syllable of recorded time;And all our yesterdays have lighted foolsThe way to dusty death.”Macbeth is a tragic hero but, like Richard III, is also villain, and like Milton, Shakespeare immerses his audience in a character study of dark shadows. By casting the lot and allowing his tragedy to live out to its necessarily bloody conclusion, Shakespeare was drawing on primal heartstrings that people of his time, and people for all time, can relate. At the black heart of this play is a fear of death, and yet a perverse and paradoxical fascination with it as well.“Stars, hide your fires; Let not light see my black and deep desires.”Though written and produced in the late 1500s and early 1600s (originally) the subject involves witchcraft and sorcery and harkens to a pagan past, not too long lost on the folks sitting at the Globe. No doubt ancient family legends and folk tales still resounded in dank cellars and back rooms, and the imagery and symbolism Shakespeare used to such potent effect served as a chilling contrast with the Christian spectators. The inchoate curse of guilt for naked ambition is a theme readily apparent.“Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”Lady Macbeth is one of the great female characters in literature. Her role as a temptress and wily beneficiary of the ruthless plan, and her eventual abysmal fall is one that resounds with readers and audiences to this day.“Things without all remedy should be without regard: what's done is done.”

  • Bookdragon Sean
    2019-04-09 20:37

    Be bloody, bold, and resolute. Laugh to scornThe power of man, for none of woman bornShall harm Macbeth.Poor old Macbeth. You were doomed from the very first act. Your mistake was believing in hearsay, prophecy and half-truths. You were an excellent Thane, noble and strong. But you were never meant to be King. You should never have told your wife about the witches, that way the fires of your ambition would never have been fanned. You only committed in halves to the witches advice. You needed to go the full way or not at all. For you are bloody. Your butcher’s work in King Duncan’s tent saw to that. Your soldier’s work on the battlefield also saw to that. You weren’t afraid to get your hands dirty and in this you were bold and daring, but none would ever call one such as you resolute. Your conscience got the better of you, it made you weak and vulnerable, and because of this you failed. Your rule failed. Your sword arm failed. You needed to go the full way or not at all. Desperation, paranoia and butchery are what followed your indecisiveness. You killed those that could have been loyal; you killed those that could have remained friends. And it was your doom. You created your own haunting, your own end. You listened to the advice of the witches when you should have followed your own path, your own mind. Their words killed you. Your faith in them killed you. Macduff was defeated at your feet, but your fear conquered you. Their words unmanned you. Macbeth! Macbeth! Macbeth! Beware Macduff.Beware the thane of Fife. Dismiss me. Enough.

  • Ahmad Sharabiani
    2019-04-17 19:34

    The Tragedy of Macbeth, William Shakespeare عنوانها: مکبث؛ تراژدی مکبث؛ نویسنده: ویلیام شکسپیر؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: سال 1972 میلادیعنوان: مکبث؛ نویسنده: ویلیام شکسپیر؛ مترجم: عبدالرحیم احمدی؛ تهران، اندیشه، چاپ دوم 1346؛ در 192 ص؛ با مقدمه : موریس مترلینگ؛ چاپ پنجم 1357؛ در 152 ص؛ موضوع: نمایشنامه های نویسندگان قرن 16 و 17 م انگلستان - قرن 17 معنوان: تراژدی مکبث؛ نویسنده: ویلیام شکسپیر؛ مترجم: فرنگیس شادمان (نمازی)؛ تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشر، 1340، چاپ دوم 1351؛ با متن انگلیسی در 101 ص؛ زیر نظر: احسان یارشاطر؛ چاپ دیگر: تهران، علمی فرهنگی؛ 1365، در 89 ص؛ چاپ بعدی 1370، در 152 ص؛ چاپ ششم: علمی فرهنگی ، 1374 در 101 ص؛ هفتم 1375؛ شابک: 9644450175؛ هشتم 1378؛ دهم 1381؛ یازدهم 1382؛ دوازدهم 1384؛ سیزدهم 1388؛ چهاردهم 1391؛ شابک: 9789644450174؛ مترجم: خسرو شایسته؛ تهران، سپیده، 1364، در 96 ص؛مترجم: داریوش آشوری؛ تهران، آگاه، 1371، در 100 ص؛ چاپ دوم 1373؛مترجم: محمدصادق شریعتی؛ تهران، گویش نوه، 1393، در 120 ص؛ شابک: 9786006382487؛مترجم: علی مجتهدزاده؛ تهران، نگارش الکترونیک، 1395، در 122 ص؛ شابک: 9786008299172؛مترجم: حمید الیاسی؛ تهران، روشنگران، 1395، در 279 ص؛ شابک: 9789641941194؛مترجم: بیتا حسینی؛ تهران، اسحاق، 1395، در 64 ص؛ شابک: 9786008175230؛تراژدی (در تراژدی همیشه سرنوشت قهرمان و دیگران، از وقایع دلپسند آغاز سپس به فاجعه ختم میشوند) مکبث را شاهکار شکسپیر خوانده اند، به گمانم همه ی آثار این نامدار، بی اغراق به چنین صفتی آراسته هستند. نمایشنامه شرح زندگی سردار دلیری ست مکبث نام، وسوسه ها او را برمیانگیزند تا ولی نعمت خود را که مهمان او نیز هست، بکشد. سپس ایشان میمانند و قلم پرفروغ استاد تراژدی، تا سیاهی تباهی روح انسانی را به نمایش درآورند. این نمایشنامه کوتاه‌ترین تراژدی و یکی از محبوب‌ترین آثار ایشان است که بنا به باور بسیاری بین سال‌های 1599 میلادی تا سال 1606 میلادی نگاشته شده است. اساس تراژدی مکبث وقایع تاریخی اسکاتلند است، اما شکسپیر موافق ذوق و طبع هنری و ادبی خویش، تغییراتی در آنها داده و رخداد جنگ‌ها را به هم آمیخته‌ است. این نمایشنامه ی جاویدان، ماجرای: آسیب جسمی، آثار منفی روحی ـ روانی، و جاه طلبی سیاسی کسانی ست، که به‌ دنبال نفس قدرت هستند. نمایشنامه نخستین بار که احتمالاً خود شکسپیر نیز در آن به ایفای نقش پرداخته؛ آپریل سال 1611 میلادی بوده، که بنا به شرح مکتوب سیمون فورمن (منجم، طبیب و گیاه‌شناس انگلیسی دربار ملکه الیزابت نخست) در تئاتر جهان، واقع در لندن اجرا شده است. نخستین نمونه ی چاپی از این نمایشنامه در سال 1623 میلادی در کتاب: مجموعه آثار نمایشنامه‌ ای کمدی، تاریخی، و تراژدیهای شکسپیر، در زمان پادشاهی جیمز یکم، در انگلستان به چاپ رسید و انتشار یافت. شاه جیمز اول را از حامیان آثار و نوشته‌ های شکسپیر دانسته اند؛ و بعضی از آثار نمایشنامه‌ ای شکسپیر در زمان او نوشته شده است. اکثر آثار اما در دوره ی سلطنت الیزابت اول، تدوین و اجرا شده اند. همه ی نمایشنامه‌ های شکسپیر ترکیبی از نظم و نثر هستند. نمایشنامه مکبث به اسثتنای چند بخش کوتاه، تقریبا به طور کامل منظوم یعنی به شعر است. پس از گذشت قرن‌ها، هنوز شخصیت‌های اصلی این نمایشنامه نظیر مکبث و بانو مکبث، جذاب و در عین حال دستمایه ی ساخت آثار اقتباسی سینمایی و تلویزیونی، تئاتر و اپرا، و اقتباس ادبی به شکل رمان، و کمیک بوک نیز بوده است. تراژدی مکبث شرح زندگی پرحادثه ی سرداری دلیر و لایق به نام مکبث است. دانکن، پادشاه شریف و مهربان اسکاتلند، او را از میان هواخواهان خود برمی‌کشد، و به وی لقب و منصب می‌بخشد، اما مکبث بر اثر تلقین جادوگران، و وسوسه ی نفس، و به اغوای زن جاه‌ طلب خویش در شبی که پادشاه میهمان ایشان هستند، او را در خواب به قتل می‌رساند، و با این قتل، جهنمی برای خویش به‌ وجود می‌آورد. مکبث از آن پس گرفتار عذاب وجدان می‌شود، چندان که هر آهنگی و هر در کوفتنی او را هراسان می‌کند. سردار مکبث، و سردار بانکو، پس از شکست سپاهیان نروژی، و در راه بازگشت به اسکاتلند، با جادوگرانی روبرو می‌شوند، که به آنها از آینده خبر می‌دهند، و در حالی که امیر کادور زنده است، او را سالار کادور می‌خوانند، و به او می‌گویند: شاه خواهد شد. ساحران در پاسخ پرسش بانکو، می‌گویند: فرزندان تو به پادشاهی می‌رسند. دو سردار غرق در شگفتی، از ساحران جدا می‌شوند. مکبث در راه بازگشت، توسط پیک دانکن پادشاه اسکاتلند، باخبر می‌شود که امیر کادور به جرم بی کفایتی به اعدام محکوم شده، و ولایت کادور نصیب او شده‌ است، و این پیام تکان دهنده، درستی پیشگویی ساحران را بر او ثابت می‌کند. دانکن امیر کادور برای تقدیر از سردار پیروز (مکبث)، به قصر او وارد می‌شود، تا شب را نیز در کاخ او سر کند؛ غافل از آنکه مکبث، با وسوسه ی همسرش لیدی مکبث، فرجامین شب زندگی او را تدارک دیده‌، دانکن در خوابگاه به قتل می‌رسد، و دستان مکبث و روان لیدی مکبث، به خون ولی نعمتشان، که به فروتنی و تواضع مشهور بوده، آلوده می‌شود. اما این پایان ماجرا نیست، و مکبث برای آنکه پیشگویی ساحران محقق نشود، قاتلانی را به کشتن فرزندان بانکو می‌گمارد. بانکو که بو برده‌، فرزندش فلیانس ممکن است کشته شود، او را فراری می‌دهد، ولی خود کشته می‌شود. مالکوم فرزند دانکن نیز می‌گریزد، تا مبادا به قتل برسد، و این بر خشم و خون‌خواری مکبث می‌افزاید. هدف بعدی او مکداف سالار فایف است، که او نیز از اسکاتلند بگریخته، و به جمع مخالفان مکبث پیوسته‌ است. اما مکبث کاخ مکداف را به آتش می‌کشد، و زن و فرزندان سالار فایف را، با قساوت به دیار عدم روانه می‌کند. اکنون مکبث و لیدی مکبث را چاپلوسان و بزدلان، دوره کرده‌ اند، و هر آنکس که اندکی شجاعت و غیرت دارد، دو راه پیش روی خویش دارد: گریختن از اسکاتلند، یا پذیرش مرگ. جوّ هولناکی بر اسکاتلند حاکم شده، و حتی مردان بزرگ نیز غالباً از ترس جان، به جنگل پناه می‌برند. لیدی مکبث که در آرزوی تاج و تخت، مبتلای جنون شده، دستان آلوده‌ اش را می‌شوید، تا خون دانکن و دیگران را از آن بزداید؛ اما هر بار بیش از پیش گرفتار عذاب وجدان می‌گردد، و در سرسرای کاخ راه می‌رود، و افشای راز می‌کند، و ندیمه و دیگران بر خود می‌لرزند، که چگونه بانو مکبث و مکبث، دستشان را به خون دیگران آلوده کرده‌ اند. پس نه مکبث و نه همسرش شادمان نیستند، و از این روی مکبث به ساحران متوسل می‌شود، تا از آنها بشنود، که آینده چگونه خواهد بود. ساحران بار دوم دیدار نیز، او را امیدوار می‌کنند، که حکومتش و جانش پابرجا خواهد بود، و مادام که جنگل بیرنام به حرکت درنیاید، و کسی که او را مادرش نزاده، آنجا نباشد، کس نمیتواند او را به قتل برساند، و او نباید نگران باشد. اما در این بین مخالفان مکبث به سرکردگی مکداف دردمند و مالکوم، درصدد حمله به اسکاتلند هستند، و لیدی مکبث نیز در اوج جنون به سر می‌برد، لیدی سرانجام جان می‌سپارد. سربازان تحت امر فرماندهان مخالف مکبث، درختان جنگل بیرنام را قطع کرده، و با استتار خود در پس آنها، به سوی مقر حکومت مکبث حمله می‌برند، و او حرکت جنگل بیرنام را، زنگ خطر تحقق پیشگویی ساحران، به حساب می‌آورد. اما هنوز امیدوار است که زنده بماند، لیکن هنگامی که از زبان مکداف می‌شنود که او از مادر زاده نشده، بلکه با جراحی از شکم مادرش وی را به دنیا آورده ‌اند (سزارین)، مرگ را پیش روی خود می‌بیند و چنین نیز می‌شود: مکداف مکبث را می‌کشد و سپاهیان وارد کاخ می‌شوند و مالکوم را به پادشاهی اسکاتلند برمی‌گزینند. ا. شربیانی

  • Loretta
    2019-03-30 00:27

    I absolutely loved this play! 😍

  • Raghad
    2019-04-04 23:46

    تعالي أيتها الأرواح الراعية للفكر الإجرامي وجرديني هنا من أنوثتي واملئيني من قمة رأسي إلى إخمص قدمي بأبشع ضروب القسوة و أحيلي ما في عروقي إلى دمٍ غليظ . وأغلقي كل منافذ الندم حتى لا تفسد علي مشاعر الرحمة خطتي الوحشية تعالي أيتها الأرواح الفتاكة الى جسدي الأنثوي وتعال الليل البهيم ملتفعًا بدخان الجحيم الداكن حتى لا ترى سكيني المشحوذة ما تحدثه من جراح و حتى لا تتمكن السماء من الرؤية عبر أطناب الظلام فتصيح بي : كفى ! كفى!ماكبث. رجل غير أخلاقي مأساته في مجتمع أخلاقيماكبث! سيد جلامس و سيد كودور والملك الذي أغتصب العرش هو وزوجتههل ينجح ماكبث بالتخلي عن طمعه ورغبته بالعرش؟ هل ستتركه زوجته وشأنه وترضى بالقدر ؟ بأن تكون مجرد زوجة نبيل من نبلاء سكوتلاندا؟ ام أنها الأخرى تطمع بالعرش الذي ليس من حقهم؟ وتطمع أن تكون ملكة سكوتلاندا؟لا لم ينجح , وأتبع طمعه وزوجته وأغتصب العرش الذي ليس من حقه وقتل قريبه الملك الطيب (دانكن)يعجز لساني عن وصف هذا الكتاب ولو أجتمعت كلمات الدنيا فلن توفي هذا الكتاب حقهتعجز الكلمات عن وصف شكسبير ووصف مؤلفاته أسلوبه الرائع يجعلك ترغب أن تقرأ كل مؤلفاتهقصة عن الطمع والخيانة . قصة عن الصراع حول العرشفي كل قراءة لي لشكسبير يزداد حبي له ولمؤلفاته

  • Fernando
    2019-04-14 02:48

    Sólo he leído cuatro libros de William Shakespeare, puesto que no es el teatro uno de las formas literarias que más me atraen, aunque cuando lo hago, suelo recalar en los más importantes como el gran bardo inglés, los griegos y aquellos autores cuyas obras de teatro hayan trascendido como las mejores de la historia (comencé a leer “Esperando a Godot” de Samuel Beckett y recuerdo también “Los poseídos” de Albert Camus inspirada en “Los demonios” de Fiódor Dostoievski). Tengo muy pendiente aún leer las obras de teatro de Oscar Wilde (sólo leí “Salomé”) o de Antón Chejov, pero bueno, no es lo que más me atrae aunque aún lo intento.En este caso, sí quería releer “Macbeth” ya que es mi tragedia preferida de William Shakespeare por ser la más oscura y perversa de todas. Creo que se sitúa en ese tenor por sobre “Hamlet” y “Rey Lear” a las que considero geniales pero que no igualan a esta. Al menos es mi humilde opinión de neófito en la materia.Veo en el personaje de Macbeth a un hombre tironeado entre el bien y el mal. Él es una especie de antepasado de Henry Jekyll y considero que Shakespeare dotó a este personaje de los clásicos elementos que distinguen a aquellos que luchan consigo mismos y que poseen claras características que definen a la temática del doble en la literatura, puesto que lo que Macbeth debe hacer (aunque no quiera) recae en su conciencia quien le juega malas pasadas puesto que está anclada en el bien: "Creí escuchar una voz que me decía: Macbeth, tú no puedes dormir, porque has asesinado al sueño."Lamentablemente, el pobre hombre sucumbe en primer lugar a sus debilidades, ya que es un hombre dotado de un débil carácter, pero para empeorar las cosas, es su esposa, Lady Macbeth, la que lo arrastra hacia lo peor ya que su influjo es negativo y mortal. Diría yo que Lady Macbeth supera en perversidad y crueldad a las tres brujas con las que Macbeth se cruzas en dos oportunidades. Su ambición no tiene límites, puesto que es ella la que quiere muerto a Duncan, el Rey de Escocia y a todo aquel que se interponga en su carrera ambiosa al trono.Su insidiosa manera de influenciar a su marido hará que todo se torne oscuro y es la traición, algo muy utilizado por Shakespeare en sus tragedias la que guiará a estos dos oscuros personajes al desenlace fatal. Ya en “Rey Lear” la traición juega un papel preponderante y en el caso de “Macbeth” es el desencadenante de una serie de asesinatos que teñirán de sangre a Escocia.Lo fantástico y sobrenatural también están presente en esta como en otras tragedias del bardo inglés, especialmente los fantasmas, como el del asesinado Banquo, cuya misión es atormentar a Macbeth. La vida de Macbeth es un verdadero suplicio: débil, influenciable, traidor, asesino y atormentado. Es realmente una tragedia, tal como nos la cuenta William Shakespeare con toda su genialidad.

  • Nayra.Hassan
    2019-04-04 19:50

    لن `تقتل الا عندما تتحرك الأشجار..و على يد رجل لم تلده امه🌲 عندما يتلاعب شكسبير بالألفاظ الي حدود تقنعني انني بلهاء حقا..لا اتقن الكتابة و لا حتى الكلام !!االاخلاص و عدم الاخلاص ؛تظل ماكبث من افضل ما تم كتابته عن عواقبهما هل هناك خير ضيق الأفق ؟ هل ماكبث بطل غبي؟ في رأيي نعم☆ فقد تحولت حياته إلى فوضى عارمة عندما طمس عقله..و انطلقت عواطفه و غرايزه لتتسع ثغرة واهنة في شخصيته...و تتحكم في اختياراتههل ماكبث بطل شرير ؟ 💀سؤال حير النقاد لقرون رغم انه قتل ملكه دون مبرر كافي...اندفع في اغتصاب العرش و قتل مرارا ليصل للسلطة و يتمكن منها..كل ما سبق لا يتوافق مع اي مباديء أخلاقية ..بل يتوافق فقط مع طموح ليدي ماكبث لكن يظل ماكبث يرى أنه كان يرمي للخير..عن طريق وصوله لآخر طريق الشر كانت جرائمه المتتالية دافعها الأساسي الخوف الذي ولدته جريمته الأولى ..فينطلق في سلسلة جرائم على مضض..غارقا في الالم و الندم☆و لكن اذا اردنا ان نتعرف على الصراع حقا..فلنتامل زوجته ليدي ماكبث المحرضة على كل الجرائم. .تصبح نفسها مسرحا لصراع عنيف ..تكتب أثناء النوم ..تغسل الدم من يديها أثناء النوم ..ليقدم شكسبير كعادته لعلم النفس هدية مبكرة هل ماكبث بطل اصلا؟👀نعم هو انا و انت وهم ..هو الانسان عندما يتحقق ما تمناه ..فيندم بل و يخجل مما تمناه♡ماكبث ♡ هي إحدى ثلاث مفضلات عندي للمارد المسرحي فهي مختصرة ..متلاحقة الأحداث.. تحتوى على تلك القوى الخارقة للطبيعة و تمثلت في نبوءة العرافات الثلاث التي تحرق الأحداث منذ البداية لكن هيهات لو فهمت شيء ..و ايضا هناك الروابط العجيبة التي تربط البطل التراجيدي الكلاسيكي بكل ما حوله..و كالعادة هي قصة حقيقية عتيقة ..لم تطبع الا بعد وفاة شكسبير بست سنوات..فهل كان المنع لأسباب سياسية؟

  • Anne
    2019-04-01 19:21

    3.5 starsSo I listened to the Playaway audio version, and it was good! Instead of someone reading the story, this one has a whole cast reading it like a play. There's even sound effects!{insert booming thunder}I know, right?!So, yeah, that was very cool!Now, as far as the actual play goes? Eh. It was ok.Wait, wait, wait! Before you tell me I'm an idiot (debatable), and that this was the best thing since sliced cheese, let me remind you that I was listening to this sucker, so it's not like I could study the words for a few seconds or anything. People with accents were speaking in some sort of Ye Olde Englishith, and some of it got lost in translation for me.Plus, I'm used to reading mostly comic books, so my brain wandered off a few times while I was listening to this. <---This will become a very important thing to remember later in this review.shrugsHere's what I got out of it:Witches! Witches everywhere!Yeah, random witches did this singsong thing, and rambled on for a bit about things that I couldn't quite make out. I'm going to assume they made predictions, and I'm going to assume the predictions were important.Double, double, toil and some other stuff.Evil queen alert!Yep. Some poor dude is about to get done in by his wife.Bet he's wishing he'd remembered their anniversary about right now...Apparently, she's having an affair with Macbeth, and talks him into killing her hubby, King Whatshisname? Doesn't matter, he's dead pretty much right off the bat.Right away, Macbeth becomes king, and (I guess) inherits Lady Whatshername Macbeth. All is going according to plan!Edit: Hey, guess what?! None of that affair stuff happened! Yeah, it seems as though I totally misinterpreted all of it. Shocking that I could do something like that! (view spoiler)[Look, you guys could at least PRETEND to be shocked. I'm not asking for much, here, am I? Just a little bit of support as I try to become better read, more well-rounded, and expand my horizons. So, you know, GASP! or something, goddamnit! (hide spoiler)]Guess Lady Macbeth was just a power-hungry twat that talked her henpecked hubby into stabbing his buddy in his sleep.Still, I think my version is cooler, and William should think about writing my idea into this play, you know?Now, here's where the plot got (more) murky for me.I guess Mr. Macbeth started killing off Olde King Whatshisname's supporters, and made himself some enemies.Plus, Lady M starts to lose her mind just a tad, and starts wandering around at night scrubbing imaginary blood off of her hands.Out, damned spot!Is it guilt? OCD? Or just the lack of a good pre-soak agent?Time to get more good advice from the witches!Bubble, bubble, you're in other stuff.Lady BigMac loses it completely, offs herself, and leaves Macbeth to deal with the consequences on his own. What a bitch, right?!But that's ok, because he doesn't seem to spend much time mourning her. It must have been love but it's over now. It must have been good but I lost it somehow...Whatever. She's dead, and these other dudes out there are pissed because he killed off their families, and besmirched their good names.You tell 'em I'm coming... and hell's coming with me, you hear?... Hell's coming with me!But Macbeth ain't skeered, see? 'Cause he's got this prophecy that the witches gave him, tucked into his back pocket.No man born from a woman will ever defeat you.So, I was thinking, Ooooh! Hey, I'll bet that means some chick is gonna stab his ass!, but I was wrong. The twist was waaaay better.Emergency C-Section, for the win!And that's it, kiddies. *takes a bow*["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>

  • Luís C.
    2019-03-29 00:22

    My Macbeth's second read.Written in an economy prodigy, one of Shakespeare's shorter pieces, based on accounts of wars between noble lineages in England, Scotland and Ireland, Macbeth is one of the author's bloodiest tragedies. Of the protagonists only two survive, it is the tragedy par excellence of human ambition. The tragedy in Scotland tells the story of Macbeth, one of King Duncan's generals, successful in his fight with the rebels. He is visited by three witches who predict their fate as future landlord and king of England. Lady Macbeth, wife of the general, plot for the king's death to put her husband in place. Fearful, Macbeth hesitates to take part in his wife's plan, but kills the king in his sleep with his blood-stained hands. Macbeth reflects on whether he made the right decision by taking that action. After the assassination of the king, Macbeth is crowned and lives moments of glory. However, Macbeth fears Banquo, the other general, who rivals him in cunning and intelligence and for whom the witches predicted that he would be the future king with his lineage, while Macbeth would not have heirs, reigning for that. Macbeth then hires two assassins to kill him, but Banquo's son Fleance escapes from death. Macbeth then begins to be haunted by the ghost of Banquo, who leads him to madness, then begin the intrigues on the part of the nobles to depose Macbeth. In visiting witches, Macbeth receives councils of apparitions that foretell Macduff's intention take the throne and also the lineage of Banquo. Malcolm, the son of the former king and Macduff, then found themselves in England and asked the king for help in deposing Macbeth, for Siward and ten thousand men borrowed by the King of England. In Scotland, Lady Macbeth goes mad and starts wiping her hands without stopping, to get rid of the blood that torments her and begins to say disconnected words. The battle is approaching and Macbeth, maddened, seeks to make sense of the words spoken by the witches. Lady Macbeth dies in her own room, and the English army is approaching with branches of trees in hand, confirming the prophecy that one day the grove would come to the castle. After the match, Macbeth is killed and only Malcolm, Ross, Macduff and other soldiers remain, crowning Malcolm as the new king.

  • Paul Bryant
    2019-04-13 02:28

    Act One. Scene Minus One.A greasy spoon café on a Blasted Heath. Three Witches at a Table.First Witch : It’s not warm, though, is it?Second Witch : Cold it be and warm it bain’t –This café could do with a coat of paintThird Witch : I wish you wouldn’t do that all the time.Second Witch : (To Waiter) Excuse me – what’s the soup of the day?Waiter: Scotch broth.Second Witch : What’s in it?Waiter : Toad, that under cold stoneDays and nights has thirty-oneSwelter'd venom sleeping got,Fillet of a fenny snake,Eye of newt and toe of frog,Wool of bat and tongue of dog,Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting,Lizard's leg and owlet's wing,Scale of dragon, tooth of wolf,Witches' mummy, maw and gulfOf the ravin'd salt-sea shark,Root of hemlock digg'd i' the dark,Gall of goat, and slips of yewSilver'd in the moon's eclipse,Nose of Turk and Tartar's lips,Finger of birth-strangled babeDitch-deliver'd by a drab.Second Witch : I’ll just have the salad then.First Witch : Now listen – we know what we’re going to say when we meet Macbeth and Banquo tomorrow but what if we run in to King Duncan? Third Witch : Okay, what about this – King thou be but not for longAlas, O Dunc, it’s all gone wrongFirst Witch : Wait – how about – You may be king but listen mateWe are the hags who know your fateIf you knew what we know Macbeth you’d hateAnd by the way you should lose some weightSecond Witch : Yes, good! I hear they call him Dunkin’ Duncan at the palace.Third Witch : What about if we run into Lady Macbeth?First Witch : Well, she won’t be wandering round the battlefield will she? That’s not logical.Third Witch : But sister weird and sister dearThis is a play by W ShakespeareGreat poet, philosopher and teacherLogic ain’t the overriding featureSecond Witch : I’m going to do this one tomorrow – Hover through fog and filthy hair-Third Witch : Hair? You should change that to air.First Witch : The night draws on so must we runBut there’s time for some tea and an iced* bunSecond Witch : Macbeth hath not the greatest witThird Witch : But let’s agree he is quite fit.Exeunt*the stress is on the second syllable

  • Dolors
    2019-03-26 00:42

    While nature remains an impassive witness that blossoms with wounded beauty and treacherous storms in “King Lear”, it embodies a mystic underworld rich with esoteric tradition and almost sacrilegious imagery in “Macbeth”.Apparitions, ghosts and witches dance at the tune of lyrical prophecies and besiege the open plains of Scotland during nighttime. Only Macbeth hears their infantile incantations:“The weyward sisters, hand in hand,Posters of the sea and land,Thus go do about, about.Thrice to thine and thrice to mine,And thrice again, to make up nine.”Alliteration, wordplay and riddles acquire supernatural connotations due to the magical significance of the number “three”, for three witches there are and three times they repeat their capricious charms.It is amidst this confusing, hallucinatory atmosphere that Macbeth arises as the merging point between reality and the afterlife, overshadowing the rest of the noblemen that sort of blur together in an undistinguishable mass of secondary characters.His presence is so engulfing that defies categorization and the archetypal part of villain or murderer, like Edmund or the deceitful sisters in “King Lear”, becomes but a deficient label to describe the protagonist of this tragedy forged in imagination. Spurred by the bewitched air and cradled by the shrouding dark, Macbeth covets the crown of Scotland devoid of greed or ambition, and like a frequent seer of the occult, he anticipates his doomed fate:“She would have died hereafter.There would have been a time for such a word.Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrowCreeps in this petty pace from day to day,To the last syllable of recorded time,And all our yesterdays have lighted foolsThe way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle.”Lady Macbeth’s venomous speech, “unsex me here, And fill me, from the crown to the toe, top full Of direst cruelty!” drips with acidity towards her husband’s manliness but neither the reasons for her ambitious aspirations nor her apparent dissatisfaction with her condition as a female are revealed.Yet it is prematurely disclosed in the opening scenes of Act I that the Macbeths are childless and that after betraying the King and his faithful friend Baquo, Macbeth seems to retaliate exaggeratedly against Madcuff and orders to have not only his wife but all his heirs brutally assassinated. Can Macbeth’s actions derive from hurt pride? Envy? Fear? The motives remain elusive, but the result is not. Because when “justice” is done, when the traitor is beheaded and Madcuff has proved his honor in avenging his family, he salutes Malcom, the heir to the throne of Scotland, and the public gathered there with the famous:“Behold, where standsThe usurper’s cursèd head. The time is free.I see thee compassed with thy kingdom’s pearl,Whose voices I desire aloud with mine:Hail, King of Scotland!”Nevertheless, the escalating grandeur of Macbeth, which grows exponentially towards a climatic explosion, has eclipsed the aberrant bloodshed to secure the kingdom and demoted it to the trivial status of the ephemeral. Macbeth’s days have been usurped by the dusky scented nights and his visionary faculty has been rewarded with the gift of immortality. He now throws his pennies in the fountain and wishes for nothing else, just like the reader.

  • ☘Misericordia☘⚡ϟ⚡ϟ⚡⛈ ❂❤❣
    2019-04-10 02:45

    A reread, a one that disappointed me a freaking lot. Once again. I really want to believe that humans are better than this. Or have been at some historical point. Then, bam!, and this arrives on my reading stack and proves to me that people have always been fucked up in their respective heads. Thanks a freaking lot! And here I was building my dreamcastle and getting ready to wear some rose glasses! This is not about a good marriage. This is about how some people can instigate each other to do weird shit (to put it extremely mildly!). Basically, if you take these two particular people going their separate ways, they might live well enough to not do too much damage to the world. But you connect them, in marriage or friendship or otherwise, and you get a boiling mix of complexes that even psychotherapy (had it even been available at that point in history, which it wasn't!) would have been hard pressed to resolve. The bottomline is: some people have synergistic effects when together, and some of those are designed by hell's blueprints.It's beautiful and all. But not everyone is likely to see all (or even most!) of the things expressed in this play. So, 4 stars. It's profound and I love the 'double trouble' thing (cheers, Mr. Potter!) but still way too somber.Q:Witch:When shall we three meet againIn thunder, lightning, or in rain? (c)Q:Hecate:Your vessels and your spells provide,Your charms and every thing beside.I am for the air; this night I'll spendUnto a dismal and a fatal end:Great business must be wrought ere noon:Upon the corner of the moonThere hangs a vaporous drop profound;I'll catch it ere it come to ground:And that distill'd by magic sleightsShall raise such artificial spritesAs by the strength of their illusionShall draw him on to his confusion:He shall spurn fate, scorn death, and bearHe hopes 'bove wisdom, grace and fear:And you all know, securityIs mortals' chiefest enemy. (c)Q:LLDouble, double toil and trouble;Fire burn, and cauldron bubble. Second WitchFillet of a fenny snake,In the cauldron boil and bake;Eye of newt and toe of frog,Wool of bat and tongue of dog,Adder's fork and blind-worm's sting,Lizard's leg and owlet's wing,For a charm of powerful trouble,Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.ALLDouble, double toil and trouble;Fire burn and cauldron bubble.Third WitchScale of dragon, tooth of wolf,Witches' mummy, maw and gulfOf the ravin'd salt-sea shark,Root of hemlock digg'd i' the dark,Liver of blaspheming Jew,Gall of goat, and slips of yewSilver'd in the moon's eclipse,Nose of Turk and Tartar's lips,Finger of birth-strangled babeDitch-deliver'd by a drab,Make the gruel thick and slab:Add thereto a tiger's chaudron,For the ingredients of our cauldron.ALLDouble, double toil and trouble;Fire burn and cauldron bubble.Second WitchCool it with a baboon's blood,Then the charm is firm and good. (c)Q:Second WitchBy the pricking of my thumbs,Something wicked this way comes. (c)

  • James
    2019-04-06 03:32

    Book ReviewAh Macbeth... good old, dark and devious Macbeth. We read this as part of a 10th grade AP English course and watched a movie to compare the differences between the two versions. Everyone has his or her own take on Macbeth. I rather enjoyed the play back in high school and then again in college during my English major. It's nearly 500 years old. Even by today's standards, it has some of the most fun drama you could imagine. It's sort of like a reality TV show, don't you think?Witches. Devious wife. Devilish husband. Death all around. Ghosts. Superstitious behavior. All great plot points. Amazing characters to work with. Fun and lyrical language. Can't say enough good things about it. But to flip the coin for a minute... was it too much all in one story? What are we supposed to learn from it? Who was this really about? Many open-ended questions I'd love to ask Mr. Shakespeare.If you've never read it... it's necessary reading for classic / historical literature. If you've read it and didn't like it, why? I'd love to know.For me, it hit the mystery sweet spot in a few ways, even though it wasn't quite a story about "who's the killer." It was more a thriller... "who else is gonna die?"Tons of adaptions. Stage plays. It's a multi-media dream come true for directors, producers and actors. As a play, it's easy to follow and moves quickly. About MeFor those new to me or my reviews... here's the scoop: I read A LOT. I write A LOT. And now I blog A LOT. First the book review goes on Goodreads, and then I send it on over to my WordPress blog at, where you'll also find TV & Film reviews, the revealing and introspective 365 Daily Challenge and lots of blogging about places I've visited all over the world. And you can find all my social media profiles to get the details on the who/what/when/where and my pictures. Leave a comment and let me know what you think. Vote in the poll and ratings. Thanks for stopping by. Note: All written content is my original creation and copyrighted to me, but the graphics and images were linked from other sites and belong to them. Many thanks to their original creators.[polldaddy poll=9729544] [polldaddy poll=9719251]

  • Manny
    2019-04-16 20:36

    For the Celebrity Death Match Review Tournament,Macbeth (30) versusThe Complete Sherlock Holmes (19)This early draft of Macbeth, recently translated from the original Klingon, casts new light on the play and has already caused its fair share of controversy. We present two extracts._________________________________MACBETH:Surely no man suspects I killed the King?Or if they do, they durst not breathe a wordKnowing our wrath...ATTENDANT:Well, actually, my lordThere's quite a few down at the bar who sayThe whole thing stinks and something's going onI think that if you went and called the copsAnd told them to investigate a bitNothing excessive, sure, they know the drillIt might be smart.LADY MACBETH:Hush, fool, and still thy tongueAnother word will surely be thy lastAnd yet it might be good to make a showOf seeking truth when all we want is liesTo this end have I summoned us some helpTwo private dicks I'm sure we can controlI have them here.[Enter HOLMES and WATSON]Come in guys, don't be shy.[To MACBETH]I've told them everything they need to know[She winks heavily at MACBETH and the ATTENDANT]They'll start investigating right awaySo all can see no coverup's afoot.[HOLMES takes out his magnifying glass and starts examining the rug]Have on't good sir, thy diligence to show!And prove Macbeth is whiter than the snow._________________________________[Night in the castle. Without, the PORTER is taking regular nips from his hip-flask and has evidently been doing so for some time. Within, WATSON, alone, is waiting for HOLMES to return. Enter MACBETH without]MACBETH:How now, my man? The night is bitter cold.PORTER:Marry, there be no night so cold that a drop of whiskey will not warm me. Ifaith, I say, more cold, that I may have the more occasion for to cure it! Many a time have I disputed this with the Englishman, but he is of another mind. What care I: he may partake of his white snuff, I of my trusty flask here, and we are both the happier. God save your Majesty! [He takes another nip]MACBETH: What sayeth the Englishman?PORTER:He is a mighty one for secrets. He examines old stained clothes with his glass, and the marks of shoes, and he holds converse with the servants. And he writes in his book, and nods, and nods again. But why he nods, that I cannot tell ye. MACBETH:What has he said?PORTER:When eight bells sounded, I heard them together. I know, Watson, he said, and soon will I have proof. [MACBETH starts violently]Knowst thy Majesty whereof he spoke?MACBETH:I will ask him direct.[MACBETH moves towards the door. Meanwhile, WATSON has been shivering, rubbing his arms, etc]WATSON:I never dreamed that Scotland was so chill!My ears are freezing. I'll just put this on.[He dons HOLMES's deerstalker hat and sighs in contentment]How warm and comfy. Wait! What was that noise?[He moves to the window and listens, turning his back to the door. MACBETH enters. Thinking he sees HOLMES, he stabs WATSON in the back. WATSON falls and MACBETH realises his mistake]MACBETH:Thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell!I took thee for thy better...WATSON:Hey, come onThat bit's from Hamlet. Oh, well, never mind.[Dies. HOLMES has meanwhile entered, and is pointing something at MACBETH]HOLMES:Thou mangy, wretched, murderous damn'd dog!I have thee covered: make no sudden moves.MACBETH:Covered? With what? Thy words mean aught to meThreaten me not: no man of woman bornMay kill Macbeth[He moves towards HOLMES, still holding his sword]HOLMES:But hark! I am no manRather an android, sent from future timesTo rid the world of such foul fiends as thee.I know thou murderedst Banquo; Duncan too;Lastly poor Watson. Let us make an end.[He shoots MACBETH with his phaser]MACBETH:Jesus and Mary, none of this makes senseAnd now you'll say you fired in self-defence.[Dies]HOLMES:I will. This night shalt thou with demons supOkay, I'm done here. Scotty, beam me up.[Exit, dematerialising]FINIS

  • Jason Koivu
    2019-03-31 01:28

    Witches, superstition and mysticism create one of the Bard's more fantastical of plays. Add to it the very real, human elements of self-doubt, manipulation, betrayal and soul-tormenting regret and you get one of the most enjoyable, poignant pieces of literature of all time.Perhaps only Hamlet reaches a higher level of human suffering encapsulated (Yes, Lear comes close.) I love the hell out Shakespeare's most popular, most well-known play, but Hamlet's interminable introspection tends to mire the spirits and reading experience, especially re-readings. Macbeth endures just the right amount of suffering for my palate. His betrayal of a friend for the chance to vault himself up the ladder of success seems like a very American idea, but so universal is the depiction of human failings that the story translates quite easily into the entertainment of other cultures. For an example, take the excellent Japanese film version "Throne of Blood".(The witch scene is cree-pay!)The Curse!One of the things that furthers the play's legend is that many believe it to be cursed. All kinds of reasons for this have been bandied about. Disasters occurred, but those can/should probably be chalked up to chance accidents due to the high number of fight scenes and violent acts that take place. Nonetheless, a feeling developed that saying the title itself brought on bad luck, thus it was considered verboten to speak the name and so it became known as "The Scottish Play."Scottish actor James McAvoy once explained to me the apparent real reason actors feared Macbeth: It being so popular, it was often put on by struggling theaters, but the production was so costly that instead of reviving the theater, it often hastened its financial ruin. If the theater went under the actors would then be out of work again, so landing a role in Macbeth became a double-edged sword.

  • Emma
    2019-04-18 03:24

    rereading this in preparation for my next WIP :)))--------------- Macbeth is my all-time favorite of Shakespeare’s plays—which, to be clear, isn’t that high of a compliment considering I’ve only read five in total and didn’t enjoy most of those. BUUUUT I swear I am not exaggerating, this one is really fucking fantastic. There’s something about the eerie atmosphere of magic, prophecy, greed, and violence that sets it apart from the others. It’s more dramatic, intriguing, and mysterious, and reads almost like a fantasy novel with a lot of political intrigue, or a dark fairytale retelling. The development of the characters is fascinating, particularly the central figures of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. At its core, this is a story about two people who conspire to seize power for themselves, and their descent into corruption and madness as they struggle to maintain their position while accepting the crimes they’ve committed. It’s very Game of Thrones-y, tbh.I have a bit of a love-hate relationship with Shakespeare, mostly because while I can appreciate his significant contributions to the English language, I don’t always enjoy deciphering the often archaic and confusing language of his plays and poetry. For some reason *cough* because it’s one of the shortest plays *cough* this doesn’t bother me so much in Macbeth, and I have quite a few favorite quotes.For example, there’s lots of Lady Macbeth being a badass bitch:Come, you spirits That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here, And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full Of direst cruelty! make thick my blood; Stop up the access and passage to remorse, That no compunctious visitings of nature Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between The effect and it! Come to my woman's breasts, And take my milk for gall, you murdering ministers, Wherever in your sightless substances You wait on nature's mischief! Come, thick night, And pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell, That my keen knife see not the wound it makes, Nor heaven peep through the blanket of the dark, To cry 'Hold, hold!'Look like the innocent flower, But be the serpent under't. I have given suck, and know How tender 'tis to love the babe that milks me: I would, while it was smiling in my face, Have pluck'd my nipple from his boneless gums, And dash'd the brains out, had I so sworn as you Have done to this.Then there’s some atmospheric shit in which Macbeth is being unsurprisingly moody:Light thickens; and the crow Makes wing to the rooky wood: Good things of day begin to droop and drowse; While night's black agents to their preys do rouse.This play also features some top-notch Shakespearean shade-throwing:Son: Thou liest, thou shag-hair'd villain! Murderer: What, you egg! *stabbing him* Young fry of treachery!Aaaand a few other good ones:I think our country sinks beneath the yoke; It weeps, it bleeds; and each new day a gash Is added to her wounds. Alas, poor country! Almost afraid to know itself. It cannot Be call'd our mother, but our grave; where nothing, But who knows nothing, is once seen to smile; Where sighs and groans and shrieks that rend the air Are made, not mark'd; where violent sorrow seems A modern ecstasy; the dead man's knell Is there scarce ask'd for who; and good men's lives Expire before the flowers in their caps, Dying or ere they sicken.Give sorrow words: the grief that does not speak Whispers the o'er-fraught heart and bids it break. To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day To the last syllable of recorded time, And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more: it is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.Basically: if you like Shakespeare, read this. If you don’t like Shakespeare, read this. I just want everyone to read this play and obsess over it with me, it’s that fricking good. ----------------------------------------rereading this because MACBETH IS MY ABSOLUTE FAV SHAKESPEARE PLAYexpect updates of me fangirling over Lady Macbeth

  • Natalie Monroe
    2019-03-26 22:42

    That's it. That's Macbeth in one sentence.

  • Maureen
    2019-04-13 03:40

    This was really interesting, and the audiobook I listened to was GREAT, but it wasn't my favorite Shakespeare. Maybe I'm just not a fan of some tragedies? In Macbeth, everyone is just the worst, but it's very interesting to read about them even if I don't love it.I want to try reading it again / seeing it, but reading it so spread out and not actually seeing it played out probably hurt my rating.

  • Emily May
    2019-04-24 19:47

    Still my favourite Shakespeare play? I think so.Language-wise, Shakespeare is always a master. He invented many a word and phrase that we all use even today, centuries later. But some of the stories and characters are better than others. Macbeth, in my opinion, sits near the top of the pile. The witches and their fateful prophecies, the bloody betrayals, the madness of Lady Macbeth, and the tragedy of Macbeth himself. Bringing about his own prophesised downfall, step by step. Nothing short of genius.

  • Darwin8u
    2019-04-06 03:25

    “Stars, hide your fires; Let not light see my black and deep desires.” ― William Shakespeare, MacbethI haven't read this since I was in HS. Loved it. Probably my biggest complaint is how slim it is. But, Shakespeare is at the top of his game. Based on an account of the reigns of Duncan and Makbeth in "the Chronicals of Scotland" in Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, it also spins into myth and alludes a bit to Seneca's tragedies. This is an efficient play. It is a sword, a knife, a razor blade; interesting and tight. And Lady Macbeth is just, well, bloody amazing. It is hard sometimes to map EXACTLY where the magic of Shakespeare happens, but with Macbeth it is fairly easy. Shakespeare is the master at weaving very human characteristics (pride, ambition, duplicity, guilt) with a dark, mythic background filled with ghosts and witches. But add to that Shakespeare's poetry (95% of this play is in verse) and grand-scale characters, and he transports this play from great to fantastic. Some of Shakespeare's most memorable lines and moments come from Macbeth. I still think there are several plays that are better (Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, King Lear, etc), but there is SOMETHING in this play that hooks me hard. Not necessarily always in a good way. But it grabs me like guilt still. Some of the best lines:― “Where shall we three meet again in thunder, lightning, or in rain? When the hurlyburly 's done, when the battle 's lost and won” (Act 1, Scene 1).― “I have no spurTo prick the sides of my intent, but onlyVaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itselfAnd falls on the other.” (Act 1, Scene 7)― “False face must hide what the false heart doth know.” (Act 1, Scene 7)― “Confusion now hath made his masterpiece.” (Act 2, Scene 3)― “By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes.” (Act 4, Scene 1)― “Life ... is a taleTold by an idiot, full of sound and fury,Signifying nothing.” (Act 5, Scene 5).

  • Nandakishore Varma
    2019-04-05 01:23

    1/11/2016Private servers and deleted emails,A slew of complaints from molested females;Presidential candidates with short fingers and dicks,A campaign dominated by insolent pricks:Scams in the name of charitable foundations,Unreleased returns and Russian relations...Double, double, toil and trouble:Fire burn, and cauldron bubble.

  • Bram
    2019-03-31 02:30

    After a discussion of this play that went over 100 comments, a review seems at once superfluous and necessary to give greater exposure to an excellent conversation. One of the best things about Goodreads is that it provides a forum to hash out discrepancies of opinion thoughtfully and passionately, so that our own feelings and understandings can be challenged by and challenging for others. I think what you’ll find below is a perfect example of this, enacted by people who care deeply about Shakespeare and about literature. People who have been changed by what they’ve read and who hope to allow others to experience something similar, to allow them to understand why certain themes are so vitally important. I like to think that my opinions, even immediately after finishing a book, are solid and well-considered. And usually this delusion goes more or less unchallenged. But below, something unusual happened, made more so by the fact that I’d done no more than give a rating and list a few undercooked criticisms. I was forced to reconsider my reading to the point where I now have to admit that I have very little confidence in my criticisms and in my response to this play. I don’t feel like I gave it my best effort because, frankly, some of the rejoinders I’ve heard are pretty impressive. Take this comment from David, who was responding to my complaint that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth seemed to lack adequate moral reasoning and background in the initial stages (i.e. Macbeth seems ‘good’ but gives in quickly/easily and Lady Macbeth seems overly and inexplicably ambitious/murderous):I think these two characters have very different dilemmas: Macbeth must overcome his aversion to the crime and his sense of honor (as subject of the king) to kill Duncan. (There is much text in the play, I think, committed to exploring his moral compunctions and waffling regarding this.) Lady Macbeth has intellectually set her mind on the crime at the beginning, so the development we see in her character isn't from 'goodness' to evil; it's from her initial intellectual commitment to the crime to her ruination at the hands of her own humanity or, if you will, by her own psychological qualms. So it would almost be nearer to the truth to say that Lady Macbeth's transition is from 'evil' to 'goodness' (in a very loose sense). In some respect, Lady Macbeth is redeemed at the end of the play; that is to say that she does not actively redeem herself, but she is redeemed by the author as a failure of evil. So the two characters have inverted character arcs, a fascinating concept that never occurred to me while reading the play. Macbeth goes from the loyal thane and hero who’s scared to commit even the ‘perfect murder’ to someone who, at the time of his demise, is a raving, fearless, and evil tyrant. Lady Macbeth, as David points out, starts out confident in her trespassing of the laws of goodness but ends up coming undone, emotionally and psychologically, from the weight of such a heinous crime. Lady Macbeth is the original Raskolnikov, a human being who thinks she might be one of the Great Ones, for whom the laws of mankind do not apply. Each of these characters believes that a sign of greatness (and for Lady Macbeth, true manliness) is an ability to achieve a certain Machiavellian perfection, wherein your conscious does not impede your achieving a goal even, and especially, if it requires murder. While Roskalnikov’s plan is more theoretical than pragmatic, the line of thinking is eerily similar. And so is the fallout. Thinking about Lady Macbeth in terms of Crime and Punishment, as Ellen inspired me to do, allowed me to flesh out her progression in a way that I wasn’t able to from the text, either due to my own failings or from what I felt was an overly-rushed story. Dostoevsky gives us an incredibly thorough picture of the post-murder descent into madness, one that can only be relieved, if at all, by coming clean. While Roskalnikov is able to take this route, Lady Macbeth is ultimately trapped, and her ‘redemption’ can only come internally with recognition that her initial perspective was hopelessly flawed and evil. It is, of course, conceivable that Lady Macbeth was not repentant and that she killed herself in madness or in the recognition that she simply wasn't a Great One, a conclusion which does not necessarily imply a belief that she was wrong in her actions. I reject these possibilities, however, because the inversion of the character arcs is such an elegant, brilliant design that nothing else seems artistically plausible. The theme in Macbeth that stuck with me most strongly during my reading was that of prophetic destiny. The power of the witches’ prophesying is not in their ability to actually carry out the events according to their predictions, but simply to plant the seed of an idea that, due to human depravity, provides a barely-needed push to send one into a destructive pursuit of base selfishness and glory. To use a tired but, in this case, warranted analogy: think about George W. Bush and the Iraq War. His religion gave him that little excuse. It planted the idea of destiny and purpose, of achieving something great and glorious that would, however, inevitably lead to the destruction and suffering of so many others, so many innocents. But he didn’t care about that. God had spoken. The witches had spoken. And who was he to get in His way? I love this website. Without it, I’d have probably given this play no more than five extra minutes of thought and moved on. And I’d have missed out on some great themes and ideas, all of which were accessible because of the ability to tap into a few of the exceptional minds here on Goodreads. I can only hope that I continue to keep an open mind and healthy suspicion of my own opinions because—and I barely need mention this—my tendency is very much in the other direction. So give this play the time and thought it deserves. You will be rewarded.